Lenzi vs Claude
If you have built a Claude prompt library for technical analysis, you have been working around a missing capability. Lenzi removes the workaround. The chart is the input.
Your prompts shrink
When the AI already sees the candles, the timeframe, and the indicators, you do not need a paragraph of setup. You just ask.
Claude prompt
“Here is a chart of SPY 1H. Volume is in the panel below. Please identify the key support and resistance levels, considering volume confirmation, and tell me where my long thesis would be invalidated...”
Lenzi prompt
“Challenge my long thesis.”
Claude prompt
“Attached is the SPY daily. I have drawn a trendline from the March low. Can you assess whether this trendline is still respected, and whether the recent pullback to the 21-EMA holds...”
Lenzi prompt
“Is the trendline still valid?”
Built for the AI-native trader
Every candle, every indicator, every drawing - read by the AI without an upload step.
Trendlines, zones, and markers appear on the chart, where they belong - not in a paragraph.
Refine the read in conversation. The AI keeps the full chart state in context across turns.
Claude can describe what it sees in an uploaded image, but it cannot read the underlying OHLCV data. It does not know the exact timeframe, the volume at each candle, or any indicator values. Lenzi reads all of that natively, from the chart you are viewing.
Your prompt library is doing the work of hacking around a missing capability - getting Claude to behave like it can see the chart. Lenzi removes that hack. The chart is the input. The drawings are the output. Your prompts become one-liners.
Lenzi uses Anthropic Claude as its reasoning model. The difference is everything around it - the market data pipeline, the structure-detection engine, the chart-drawing tools, and a workspace built specifically for technical analysis on US equities and ETFs.